Administrative Proceedings
Jump to: Contested Case Hearings | Rulemaking | Appeals | Representative Matters
Companies in a wide range of industries are subject to environmental regulation by state and federal agencies with confusing, and sometimes even conflicting, statutes, procedures and objectives. Our Environmental attorneys are on the cutting edge of developments in this rapidly changing field. Over the years, we have developed trusted relationships with key decision-makers at these agencies that enable us to effectively educate, defend and advocate for our clients in administrative proceedings.
Our administrative and civil enforcement experience includes defense of energy, chemical, agriculture and manufacturing clients in contested RCRA, CWA, CAA and EPCRA proceedings with EPA Region VI and the TCEQ. We also represent companies before the Railroad Commission and handle appeals before various administrative agencies. Our extensive experience enables us to develop innovative solutions for clients, helping them anticipate regulatory changes and efficiently obtain the permits necessary to keep their businesses moving forward. When enforcement issues arise, our attorneys are skilled in defending clients through the case hearing, rulemaking and appeals processes. Whether seeking new permits, amending existing permits, or defending against an enforcement action, our attorneys are well-equipped to handle these administrative proceedings from beginning to end.
Contested Case Hearings
In recent years, we've successfully defended clients in some of the largest and most significant contested case hearings in Texas. Our attorneys have extensive experience in every aspect of the hearing process, from pre-filed testimony through discovery and motion practice, evidentiary hearings, closing arguments, and, when necessary, appeal.
In many cases, contested permits or enforcement actions can be resolved without administrative action through skillful negotiation with interested parties and the public. Because we have extensive experience in compliance and permitting, including public participation in the process, we are able to recommend strategies for obtaining approvals in the most efficient manner possible.
Rulemaking
We take a proactive approach to addressing environmental regulatory problems before they create hardships for our clients. Our attorneys routinely file comments to rules proposed by the various regulatory agencies at the state and federal level. We also take an active role in stakeholder hearings that are held before those agencies. At the request of our clients, we file comments or attend hearings on specific issues that have the potential to impact their businesses.
Appeals
In the event that a client should need to appeal a ruling or enforcement action, we are highly skilled in the appeals process. Although we work to minimize administrative hassles on the front end, should administrative actions become adversarial, our Litigation team has extensive experience defending clients in both administrative settings and against federal and state governmental environmental enforcement actions.
- Administrative Proceedings
- Air Quality
- Biodiesel and Advanced Biofuels
- Carbon Management & Climate Change
- Compliance and Enforcement
- Environmental Due Diligence and Risk Assessment
- Environmental Litigation and Toxic Tort
- Mining Regulatory
- Project Development & Permitting
- Remediation
- Superfund
- Waste
- Water Quality
- Water Supply
- Industries We Represent
Environmental Spotlight

Leonard H. Dougal
(512) 236-2233
ldougal@jw.com
REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS:
- We represented the owner of a major dairy CAFO, located in the environmentally sensitive North Bosque River watershed, in a hotly contested permit hearing, and successfully obtained a new TPDES water quality permit, which allowed our client to continue to operate and expand the dairy.
- For the owner of a large poultry egg operation, we successfully obtained a new TPDES water quality permit for the operation, following a contested hearing at the State Office of Administrative Hearings. We also successfully defended that permit on appeal.
- Before the TCEQ, we represented an energy client in water quality matters concerning the proposed listing of the Lake Arlington cooling water body as thermally impaired under Section 303d of the Clean Water Act. We successfully demonstrated that the proposed listing was unnecessary.
- Before EPA and TCEQ, we represented electrical generating industries regarding the implementation of the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, and the Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/Galveston State Implementation Plans. This included developing emissions specifications for attainment demonstrations and system cap compliance mechanisms.
- We have successfully defended a concrete production operation's air permit before the TCEQ and the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH). In 2009, we completed a number of environmental audits for a large Readymix operation. In 2008, we assisted a central Texas quarry with securing an Edwards Aquifer Water Pollution Abatement Plan and with an exemption from a municipal development ordinance. Our attorneys continue to assist these clients with groundwater and surface water rights, reclaimed water projects, and with groundwater conservation district rulemakings.


