Skip to content
Jackson Walker
  • People

        • View All People
  • Experience
        • Bankruptcy, Restructuring, & Recovery
        • Business Immigration & Compliance
        • Corporate & Securities
        • Cybersecurity, Data Protection, & Privacy
        • Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (ERISA)
        • Energy
        • Environment & Natural Resources
        • Finance & Banking
        • Government Relations & Public Policy
        • Healthcare
        • Insurance
        • Intellectual Property
        • International
        • Investigations & White Collar Defense
        • Labor & Employment
        • Land Use
        • Real Estate
        • Tax
        • Trial & Appellate Litigation
        • Wealth Planning
  • News
        • All News
        • Fast Takes Podcasts
        • Subscribe to JW News & Insights
        • Insights
        • COVID-19 Insights & Resources
  • Offices
        • Austin
        • Dallas
        • Fort Worth
        • Houston
        • San Angelo
        • San Antonio
        • Texarkana
  • Meet JW
    • How We Work
      • Globalaw
      • Project Management
      • Value Management
    • What We Value
      • Community
      • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Jackson Walker Women
      • Pro Bono
    • Who We Are
      • Meet JW Videos
      • Fast Takes Podcasts
      • Recognition
      • JW Alumni
  • JW Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Search



Contact | Careers | COVID-19
Jackson Walker
Chris Cravey

Chris Cravey

Partner, Houston
713.752.4247
ccravey@jw.com
Email LinkedIn vCard Print
Practice Experience Recognition & Accolades Publications & Speeches Community Involvement Client Results

Practice Areas

  • Trial & Appellate Litigation
  • Intellectual Property

Experience

  • Copyrights
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Patent Prosecution

Biography

Chris has extensive experience representing clients in patent disputes related to highly technical and complex technology. Chris has served as trial counsel in numerous patent infringement lawsuits in various jurisdictions, including the Western District of Texas, the Eastern District of Texas, the Southern District of Texas, the Northern District of California, the United States International Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court.

Chris has served as first chair trial counsel in two major patent infringement cases tried to a jury. Chris has also served as first chair trial counsel in appeals to the Federal Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. In addition to having first chair experience, Chris has been involved in all phases of patent litigation, including initial case assessment, discovery, and arguing claim construction and dispositive motions. Chris’ litigation experience has covered a wide array of technologies, including:

  • Ethernet
  • Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
  • cloud computing
  • video graphics
  • wireless networking
  • GPS
  • fixed rotary drill bits
  • reflective insulation

Chris also has experience representing clients in Texas trade secret cases and has assisted in seeking temporary restraining orders and in resolving cases through mediation.

In addition to litigation matters, Chris has extensive experience in patent counseling and prosecution, including prosecution of international patent applications through the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Representative technologies include:

  • computer architecture and systems
  • telecommunications
  • wireless technologies
  • computer networks
  • semiconductor manufacturing processes
  • video display systems
  • real-time data solutions
  • measurement-while-drilling (MWD) solutions
  • mechanical devices

Chris also advises clients on intellectual property acquisition, divestiture, licensing, and enforcement issues.

Education

B.S.E.E., magna cum laude, Texas A&M University

J.D., cum laude, University of Houston Law Center

MBA, University of Houston

Basic Mediation Training, A.A. White Dispute Resolution Center, University of Houston Law Center

Bar Admissions

Texas, 2002

Court Admissions

United States District Court for the Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas

United States Patent and Trademark Office

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Supreme Court

Practice Experience Recognition & Accolades Publications & Speeches Community Involvement Client Results

Over the past 15 years, Chris has successfully represented clients on both sides of the patent litigation docket. Representative cases include:

  • ESW Holdings, Inc. v. Roku, Inc. (Western District of Texas – Waco Division) – Obtained a complete defense jury verdict for Roku, Inc. in what started as a five-patent infringement case. Prior to trial, the Court granted Roku’s summary judgment motion of no infringement as to two of the five patents. Another patent was dismissed with prejudice. After a four-day trial on the remaining two patents in which the plaintiff sought $228 million in damages, the jury returned a verdict of no infringement for both patents and found invalidity on the one patent challenged by Roku. Plaintiff was awarded no damages.
  • Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. ALE USA Inc. (Federal Circuit and Supreme Court) – On behalf of defendant ALE USA Inc. in a patent infringement case involving standardized Power-over-Ethernet technology obtained a complete defense victory following two Federal Circuit appeals and a request for rehearing en banc; Chris was co-lead counsel for ALE in defending against a petition for writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court denied on June 29, 2020.
  • Gryphon Oilfield Sols., LLC v. Stage Completions (USA) Corp. et al. (Southern District of Texas – Houston Division) – On behalf of defendant Stage Completions successfully defended against a motion for preliminary injunction. The case proceeded through claim construction and the case settled after Stage Completions obtained favorable constructions.
  • Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC (Federal Circuit) – On behalf of appellant Packers Plus successfully argued that the PTAB’s Written Decision should be vacated and remanded for further proceedings.
  • Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC v. Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. (Federal Circuit) – On behalf of appellee Packers Plus obtained affirmance of the PTAB’s Written Decision invalidating all challenged claims.
  • Exacta Frac Energy Services, Inc. et al. v. Paul Bernard Lee (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) – On behalf of Petitioners in two inter partes reviews invalidated all challenged claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,187,989 and 9,869,163.
  • Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex.) – On behalf of defendant ALE USA Inc. in a patent infringement case involving Power-over-Ethernet technology, obtained judgment as a matter of law that there was no willful infringement and a jury verdict favorable on damages.
  • Promethean Insulation Technology LLC v. Sealed Air Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:13-cv-1113 (E.D. Tex) – Represented plaintiff in a patent infringement lawsuit involving reflective insulation technology. The case was favorably settled after trial.
  • U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:10-cv-03724 (N.D. Cal.) – Patent infringement lawsuit involving Ethernet technology. Obtained summary judgment of non-infringement. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling.
  • In the matter of Certain Devices With Secure Communications Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-858 – Represented respondent in a patent infringement investigation involving secure communication networks. Investigation was dismissed after claim construction hearing.
  • In the Matter of Certain Devices with Secure Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-818 (2011-2012) – Represented respondent in a first patent infringement investigation involving secure communication networks. Case was successfully terminated for lack of standing.
  • ReedHycalog UK, Ltd., et al. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations. Inc., et al., Case No. 6:06-cv-222 (E.D. Tex.) – Represented plaintiff and counter-defendant, ReedHycalog, in a patent infringement lawsuit involving fixed rotary drill bit technology. The case was favorably settled.
  • Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. LG Electronics Mobile Communications Company, et al., No. 5:06-cv-00044 (N.D. Cal.) – Represented inventor’s company in a patent infringement lawsuit involving GPS technology in mobile telephones. The case was favorably settled.

Rising Stars, Thomson Reuters, 2012

Hot Topics in IP Litigation: Litigating Patent Venue post-TC Heartland and Negotiating Licenses post-Impression Products, October 10, 2017 Jackson Walker

Business Method Patents – An Overview of Selected Topics, July 12, 2004 Vinson & Elkins

Sovereign Immunity as a Defense to Intellectual Property Infringement, Feb. 10, 2003 Vinson & Elkins

  • Hon. Nancy F. Atlas IP American Inn of Court
  • Houston Bar Association
  • Eastern District of Texas Bar Association
  • Houston Intellectual Property Law Association
Jackson Walker Obtains Summary Judgment of No Infringement for Roku in WDTX Patent Dispute

April 13, 2021

Jackson Walker Delivers Complete Defense Jury Verdict for Roku in $228 Million WDTX Patent Trial

April 13, 2021

US Supreme Court Denies Petition Following Federal Circuit and PTAB Decisions, Enabling ALE USA Inc. to Prevail in Patent Dispute

July 2, 2020

Jackson Walker Obtains Successful Federal Circuit Result For Packers Plus Energy Services

May 15, 2019

Practice Experience

Over the past 15 years, Chris has successfully represented clients on both sides of the patent litigation docket. Representative cases include:

  • ESW Holdings, Inc. v. Roku, Inc. (Western District of Texas – Waco Division) – Obtained a complete defense jury verdict for Roku, Inc. in what started as a five-patent infringement case. Prior to trial, the Court granted Roku’s summary judgment motion of no infringement as to two of the five patents. Another patent was dismissed with prejudice. After a four-day trial on the remaining two patents in which the plaintiff sought $228 million in damages, the jury returned a verdict of no infringement for both patents and found invalidity on the one patent challenged by Roku. Plaintiff was awarded no damages.
  • Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. ALE USA Inc. (Federal Circuit and Supreme Court) – On behalf of defendant ALE USA Inc. in a patent infringement case involving standardized Power-over-Ethernet technology obtained a complete defense victory following two Federal Circuit appeals and a request for rehearing en banc; Chris was co-lead counsel for ALE in defending against a petition for writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court denied on June 29, 2020.
  • Gryphon Oilfield Sols., LLC v. Stage Completions (USA) Corp. et al. (Southern District of Texas – Houston Division) – On behalf of defendant Stage Completions successfully defended against a motion for preliminary injunction. The case proceeded through claim construction and the case settled after Stage Completions obtained favorable constructions.
  • Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC (Federal Circuit) – On behalf of appellant Packers Plus successfully argued that the PTAB’s Written Decision should be vacated and remanded for further proceedings.
  • Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC v. Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. (Federal Circuit) – On behalf of appellee Packers Plus obtained affirmance of the PTAB’s Written Decision invalidating all challenged claims.
  • Exacta Frac Energy Services, Inc. et al. v. Paul Bernard Lee (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) – On behalf of Petitioners in two inter partes reviews invalidated all challenged claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,187,989 and 9,869,163.
  • Chrimar Systems, Inc., et al. v. Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex.) – On behalf of defendant ALE USA Inc. in a patent infringement case involving Power-over-Ethernet technology, obtained judgment as a matter of law that there was no willful infringement and a jury verdict favorable on damages.
  • Promethean Insulation Technology LLC v. Sealed Air Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:13-cv-1113 (E.D. Tex) – Represented plaintiff in a patent infringement lawsuit involving reflective insulation technology. The case was favorably settled after trial.
  • U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:10-cv-03724 (N.D. Cal.) – Patent infringement lawsuit involving Ethernet technology. Obtained summary judgment of non-infringement. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling.
  • In the matter of Certain Devices With Secure Communications Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-858 – Represented respondent in a patent infringement investigation involving secure communication networks. Investigation was dismissed after claim construction hearing.
  • In the Matter of Certain Devices with Secure Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-818 (2011-2012) – Represented respondent in a first patent infringement investigation involving secure communication networks. Case was successfully terminated for lack of standing.
  • ReedHycalog UK, Ltd., et al. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations. Inc., et al., Case No. 6:06-cv-222 (E.D. Tex.) – Represented plaintiff and counter-defendant, ReedHycalog, in a patent infringement lawsuit involving fixed rotary drill bit technology. The case was favorably settled.
  • Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. LG Electronics Mobile Communications Company, et al., No. 5:06-cv-00044 (N.D. Cal.) – Represented inventor’s company in a patent infringement lawsuit involving GPS technology in mobile telephones. The case was favorably settled.

Recognition & Accolades

Rising Stars, Thomson Reuters, 2012

Publications & Speeches

Hot Topics in IP Litigation: Litigating Patent Venue post-TC Heartland and Negotiating Licenses post-Impression Products, October 10, 2017 Jackson Walker

Business Method Patents – An Overview of Selected Topics, July 12, 2004 Vinson & Elkins

Sovereign Immunity as a Defense to Intellectual Property Infringement, Feb. 10, 2003 Vinson & Elkins

Community Involvement

  • Hon. Nancy F. Atlas IP American Inn of Court
  • Houston Bar Association
  • Eastern District of Texas Bar Association
  • Houston Intellectual Property Law Association

Practice Areas

  • Intellectual Property
  • Trial & Appellate Litigation

Experience

  • Copyrights
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Patent Prosecution

News

  • IP Litigation Insider—June 2021
  • Jackson Walker Obtains Summary Judgment of No Infringement for Roku in WDTX Patent Dispute
  • Jackson Walker Delivers Complete Defense Jury Verdict for Roku in $228 Million WDTX Patent Trial
  • US Supreme Court Denies Petition Following Federal Circuit and PTAB Decisions, Enabling ALE USA Inc. to Prevail in Patent Dispute
  • Jackson Walker Obtains Successful Federal Circuit Result For Packers Plus Energy Services
More News
© 2022 Jackson Walker LLP
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies & Tracking Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising
  • SCAC
  • JW Login
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Instagram
  • Who We Are
  • What We Value
  • How We Work
Subscribe to JW News & Insights
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. View Cookie Policy Allow Cookies
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT