Joseph A. Fischer
Joseph “Tré” August Fischer, III has broad experience representing companies in the natural gas transportation and processing, electric generation, metals and chemical manufacturing, and real estate industries in complex litigation, in a wide range of transactional matters, before administrative and regulatory bodies, and concerning compliance and liability issues; with litigation of all kinds for corporate, individual, and insurance clients on both sides of the docket; and with the management, litigation, and resolution of environmental issues and natural resource damages claims.
In addition to many years in private practice, Tré served as Vice President & Deputy General Counsel for TRC Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRR) and Assistant General Counsel for Kaiser Aluminum Corp. (Nasdaq: KALU). His in-house experience provided Tré an uncommon breadth of experience managing and resolving a myriad of complex and significant matters and issues and provides him exceptional insight in serving the needs of and proactively representing the interests of his corporate and individual clients. As former in-house counsel, he has a keen insight in and appreciation for the challenges facing in-house counsel in today’s legal environment. Tré also served as an adjunct professor at the University of Houston Law Center, teaching civil procedure, legal analysis, and legal research and writing to law students. While attending law school, he worked as a tax accountant at Price Waterhouse.
With a primary focus on complex energy, real estate, and business litigation matters, Tré’s nearly thirty years of litigation experience includes both commercial disputes and significant personal injury matters. He also has handled the investigation and litigation resulting from catastrophic explosions, releases, spills, and other industrial incidents. Tré has represented both plaintiffs and defendants and has trial and appellate experience in both state and federal courts. He regularly practices before both, as well as before regulatory agencies and arbitration panels. He has broad experience in the energy industry, representing public and private natural gas pipeline companies, natural gas processing companies, natural gas traders, electric power generators, and oil and gas producers in federal and state courts and before arbitration panels throughout the country. He also has significant experience representing real estate developers and commercial real estate owners in important litigation, including in material mass actions.
Tré has litigated gas purchase, gas gathering, and gas processing agreements; Edison Electric Institute (EEI) master power purchase and sale agreements and other power purchase agreements; International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreements and North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) standard agreements; and numerous commercial contracts in the energy, real estate, and manufacturing industries. Often litigating outside of Texas, Tré has handled litigation in Louisiana, Colorado, California, Florida, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Washington, and Wisconsin and has served as national coordinating counsel for defendants facing litigation in multiple jurisdictions. Tré has managed and successfully resolved numerous complex, high-profile litigation matters with $100s of million at stake. He is particularly skilled at defending substantial litigation calling for the leadership and management of large litigation teams, often of more than a dozen lawyers, whether solely within Jackson Walker or spanning multiple co-counsel firms.
Transactional Structuring, Negotiation, and Documentation
Recognizing his skill and experience handling complex, high-stakes legal matters in many contexts, Tré’s clients often call upon him outside of litigation. Tré has considerable experience in transaction structuring, negotiation, and documentation in the energy and manufacturing industries across a broad range of asset, stock, and real estate transactions in several states and internationally. He has particular experience with transactions involving natural gas assets, gathering agreements, and processing agreements in the midstream segment and with transactions involving contaminated properties, environmental risk transfer, Brownfield redevelopment, distressed assets, and other complex legal and risk management issues. He also has developed, implemented, and managed environmental, health, and safety audit and compliance programs.
Environmental Compliance, Remediation & Litigation
Tré’s experience with respect to environmental matters is extensive, having been a consistent facet of his practice throughout his career. He has represented sellers, buyers, owners, developers, responsible parties, and regulatory agencies at more than 100 Superfund sites in all 10 US EPA regions and at numerous state-lead sites, and concerning dozens of transactions involving sites throughout the United States. Tré frequently develops customized combinations of legal, regulatory and financial tools to ensure the appropriate allocation of liability and risk. His experience includes prosecution and defense of governmental enforcement actions and claims involving natural resource damage, personal injury and property damage, and cost-recovery and indemnification. He also has unique experience with the resolution of environmental obligations and claims in the context of bankruptcy proceedings. Through years of experience working with clients, technical consultants, and engineers to effect the cost-effective remediation of environmental sites and ensure compliance with legal obligations, he is adept at understanding and balancing competing commercial and legal issues without sacrificing either.
B.A., Rice University
J.D., magna cum laude, University of Houston Law Center
District of Columbia
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits
United States District Court for the Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas
United States District Court for the Middle, Eastern and Western Districts of Louisiana
United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
United States District Court for the District of Colorado
- Defending one of the country’s largest electric generators from more than 100s of claims alleging wrongful death, other personal injuries, and property damage in connection with power outages during Winter Storm Uri, with those cases consolidated into an MDL in Texas state court. Appointed liaison counsel on behalf of the more than 300 defendants in the MDL.
- Also defending one of the largest pipeline companies in America as well as a global manufacturer and distributor of chemical products and ERCOT load resource in the same MDL.
- Defending the developer of The Woodlands, Texas in claims by more than 500 plaintiffs concerning more than 250 properties alleging negligent development, violations of Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), and breach of express and implied warranties concerning flooding caused by Hurricane Harvey.
- Defending one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America against claims by a Top 10 independent oil producer alleging breach of two gas purchase agreements and seeking $100s of million in damages under life of lease contracts.
- Defending one of the largest electric utilities in the United States against claims by a natural gas supplier and pipeline company alleging breaches of an agency agreement and tariff concerning alleged liability for operational flow order (OFO) penalties and replacement gas charges.
- Representing an ERCOT market load resource, prosecuting claims against a natural gas and electric power marketing company for breaches of an Edison Electric Institute (EEI) master power purchase and sale agreement and related transaction confirmations and qualified scheduling entity (QSE) agreement in connection with ancillary service fees and force majeure issues stemming from Winter Storm Uri.
- Representing the owner of an iconic office tower in Downtown Houston in litigation concerning disputed rent escalation under a long-term ground lease of the real property underlying the building.
- Representing several officers and directors of a publically traded company, obtained Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of a shareholder’s claims seeking disgorgement of alleged short-swing insider trading profits under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and obtained affirmance from the Fifth Circuit. See Jordan v. Flexton, 729 Fed. Appx. 282 (5th Cir. 2018).
- Represented a leading energy supplier and natural gas marketer in claims alleging breach of a North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) natural gas purchase agreement and transaction confirmation in connection with a disputed event of force majeure related to Winter Storm Uri and attendant orders from the Railroad Commission of Texas.
- Defended the Woodlands Land Development Company against the claims of more than 70 plaintiffs concerning more than 40 properties alleging negligent development, violations of Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), breach of express and implied warranties, fraud, and other business torts concerning allegations that undisclosed geologic conditions are affecting plaintiffs’ residences. After heated discovery, obtained full vindication for the defendants via multiple summary judgments, which were affirmed on appeal and declined to be reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court. See Bunch v. Woodlands Land Dev. Co., LP, No. 09–16–00136–CV, 2017 WL 3081095 (Tex. App.–Beaumont July 20, 2017, pet. denied) (mem. op.).
- Defended one of the country’s largest natural gas gathering and midstream companies in multiple royalty cases in several states, including Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Ohio, with allegations including fraud, conspiracy, violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), state and federal antitrust violations, and other business torts. In addition to serving as Texas counsel, Tré also served as national coordinating counsel.
- Defending a large electric power generation company against multiple state and federal MDL class action antitrust claims alleging the client engaged in a conspiracy to manipulate natural gas and electricity markets through alleged “wash sales,” “Churning,” and false reporting and seeking in excess of $1 billion. Chosen by the ten company joint defense group to lead opposition to class certification in multiple states and successfully did so; subsequently defended that decision for the defense group to the 9th Circuit.
- Represented a midstream company in litigation concerning disputes over the interpretation of several platform and production handling agreements and attendant entitlement to fees and revenue.
- Prosecuted claims by a merchant power plant operator in two cases against Southern California Edison concerning alleged events of default in connection with complex bankruptcy proceedings, alleged improper termination of two long term power purchase agreements, and disputes concerning the proper application of mark-to-market damages clauses and attendant calculations, with one case subject to arbitration and one prosecuted in Los Angeles federal court and with total damages exceeding $100 million.
- Defended a Texas electric cooperative in litigation brought by its customers alleging breach of contract and other disputes concerning the interpretation of long term power purchase agreements that threatened the future of the facility.
- Defended a large electric power generation company in litigation with several former executives concerning disputes over whether a change in control had occurred under certain executive incentive compensation plans and retention agreements. The aggressive defense strategy resulted in an early victory via summary judgment before substantial defense costs were incurred.
- Defended the unregulated natural gas trading arm of a large Pacific Northwest electric utility and transmission and distribution company from claims brought by several natural gas traders alleging breaches of compensation agreements requiring deconstruction of complex derivative transactions with disputed mark-to-market valuations.
- Prosecuted claims by one of the country’s largest natural gas producers concerning breach of representations and warranties against the seller of numerous producing properties and a natural gas gathering system with issues concerning pipeline integrity and 404 permitting.
- Defended a midstream company in claims brought by a natural gas processor alleging breaches of contract and a long term dedication.
- Represented the owner of a property in Spokane, Washington adjacent to a federal Superfund site and a separate state-lead site in negotiations with the US Environmental Protection Agency, the Washington Department of Ecology, and the adjunct owners on a comprehensive, favorable settlement allowing no further action, property sales, and future redevelopment into multiple end-uses, including retail, healthcare, and residential.
- Defended a natural gas processor in claims brought by its primary customer concerning alleged breaches of several processing contracts following a disputed force majeure event that resulted in the destruction of a high-sulfur gas processing plant, including claims of reservoir damage and property damage and significant lost profits.
- Prosecuted claims on behalf of a midstream company in litigation against one of the world’s largest manufacturers of power sources and other equipment in the marine and energy markets in connection with alleged breaches of a long term maintenance contract concerning several large bore generators. Following successful enforcement of the parties’ disputed arbitration agreement through appeals to the Texas Supreme Court, prevailing at every level and defeating attempted dismissal via summary judgment, obtained a favorable monetary judgment and an award of attorneys’ fees following an evidentiary trial before a panel of three arbitrators.
- Defended an interstate gas pipeline against claims seeking more than $100 million for alleged breach of a straddle contract with a gas processing plant in Louisiana.
- Represented a former owner of a processing plant in litigation with the current owner concerning responsibility for environmental contamination at the facility involving complex issues of historic and current contamination, comingled plumes, and hydrocarbon fingerprinting.
- Defended a pipe manufacturer in a breach of contract suit over the delivery of allegedly defective pipe for a transcontinental oil pipeline.
- Assumed responsibility for and successfully concluded the litigation arising out of the July 1999 explosion at Kaiser Aluminum’s Gramercy, Louisiana alumina refinery. The catastrophic explosion spawned in excess of 100 lawsuits both by and against Kaiser, including a certified class of over 24,000 plaintiffs claiming exposure to various chemicals, substantial individual personal injury cases, and complex commercial and insurance coverage disputes. Responsible for managing the legal strategy which resulted in Kaiser’s successful defense of claims against it seeking in excess of $100 million in damages and its successful prosecution of claims to recover its $450 million in damages.
- Represented the owner of a refinery in Louisiana in successful prosecution of design processional negligence claims against an engineering and construction company charged with designing and rebuilding the refinery following an explosion, including claims of damages due to delay.
- Led the early crisis response to significant industrial accident in Louisiana, including an investigation by the federal Mine Health and Safety Administration that began nearly immediately. Managed and coordinated an extensive internal investigation, with both privileged and confidential and public components, and handled the litigation with the injured parties. Aggressively defended the cases within budget, resulting in withdrawal of the majority of the citations which had been issued and a summary judgment, which was upheld by the Fifth Circuit on appeal, in favor of the defense.
- Led a team of lawyers, accountants, and other professionals to successfully reconcile the more than 10,000 claims asserting liabilities exceeding $10 billion filed in Kaiser’s Chapter 11 case in a cost-effective and timely manner. Developed and successfully implemented a strategy for favorably resolving these claims.
- Successfully prosecuted several airbag products liability matters involving wrongful death and serious personal injury against major automobile manufacturers. These expert witness intensive cases involved highly specialized technical issues requiring detailed understanding and evaluation, and were aggressively and contentiously defended by the manufacturers. In each case, successfully collected substantial damages for the plaintiffs.
Environmental and Transactional Matters
- In connection with Chesapeake Energy Corporation’s sale of more than $2 billion in midstream gathering assets, represented the buyer to negotiate and document multiple long-term natural gas gathering and processing agreements concerning midstream assets in the Bossier, Haynesville, Eagle Ford, Marcellus, Niobrara, and Utica shale plays in seven states (Texas, Louisiana, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Wyoming), with both fixed fee and cost of service structures. Representation included responsibility for negotiating and documenting numerous new gas gathering and processing agreements across the portfolio to support the transaction as well as advising on various aspects of the transaction and having primary responsibility for coordinating with and resolving differences between several competing stakeholders.
- Represented midstream natural gas company in the negotiation and documentation of more than two dozen long-term natural gas gathering and processing agreements concerning assets in the Barnett, Haynesville, Eagle Ford, Marcellus, and Niobrara shale plays, with both fixed fee and cost of service structures, entered over the course of several years with various oil and gas producers and midstream companies.
- Successfully negotiated a groundbreaking multi-site environmental Consent Decree with three federal agencies, including all ten US EPA regions; the states of California, Rhode Island and Washington; and the Puyallup Tribe of Indians. The agreement resolved approximately $700 million of asserted liabilities at approximately 100 separate Superfund sites and ensured favorable treatment of future claims regarding future sites.
- Successfully negotiated the first environmental settlement in Washington state involving the use of a custodial trust and environmental insurance. In this unprecedented agreement, Kaiser Aluminum transferred a fifty-acre federal Superfund site to a custodial trust, negotiated and established for the purpose, to be administered under the supervision of the State of Washington and US EPA Region Ten. Kaiser obtained a full Covenant Not to Sue and contribution protection under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Washington Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA).
- Led a team of lawyers, environmental professionals, outside consultants, and real estate experts to balance competing market, labor, regulatory, and environmental issues and maximize positive value at an indefinitely-curtailed smelter in Spokane, Washington which included more than 1,000 acres of land in various stages of development and entitlement status and which contained a listed federal Superfund site. The strategy generated proceeds in excess of $20 million while resolving over $70 million in environmental and closure obligations.
- Led all aspects of the sale of a curtailed and environmentally-impacted smelter in Tacoma, Washington with material environmental issues, including portions which were in a federal Superfund site. The sale generated cash proceeds in excess of $10 million and resulted in the seller’s release from the attendant environmental and closure liabilities.
- Facilitated the sale of an alumina refinery with material environmental and closure liabilities, including numerous former spills, several landfills and dump sites in various stages of closure, and several existing solid and hazardous waste facilities, which threatened the transaction. Successfully negotiated and implemented an innovative combination of regulatory relief, environmental insurance, and environmental escrows to maximize the sales proceeds while minimizing future responsibility for the seller.
- Led the development and implementation of individualized and innovative exit strategies for approximately two dozen environmentally impacted properties in multiple states owned by a large manufacturing concern, employing a wide-range of legal, regulatory, risk management, and financial tools to facilitate a successful Chapter 11 reorganization.
- The Best Lawyers in America (Woodward/White Inc.)
- Commercial Litigation, 2021-2022
- Rising Star, Texas Monthly
- O’Connor’s, Texas Oil & Gas – Statues & Regulations, Editor, 2014-2021
- Litigation Affecting the Natural Gas Industry, Chapter 51 of Regulation of the Gas Industry (Matthew Bender Elite Products, 5 volume set) (2019-2021)
- The State Bar of Texas
- Litigation Section
- Environmental Section
- The Houston Bar Association
- Litigation Section
- Environmental Section
- The Louisiana Bar Association
January 10, 2022Attorney News
Jackson Walker is pleased to announce the arrival of five Houston litigators focused on probate, trust, and fiduciary litigation. The team is led by Sarah Patel Pacheco and includes Kathleen Tanner Beduze, Joshua R. Flores, Joe R. Savoie, and Jocelyn Thibodaux Slater.
August 19, 2021Attorney News
‘The Best Lawyers in America’ Honors 178 Jackson Walker Attorneys in 2022 Edition, Including 8 “Lawyers of the Year” and 31 “Ones to Watch”
The Best Lawyers in America has recognized 178 Jackson Walker attorneys across 6 offices and 67 specialty practice areas in its 2022 edition, including 8 Lawyers of the Year and 31 Ones to Watch. Best Lawyers listings are based on an exhaustive peer review survey of thousands of attorneys who vote on the legal abilities of others in their practice areas.
August 13, 2021Mentions
Six months after the February winter storm impacted the Texas energy grid, Law360 spoke with Jackson Walker partner Joseph “Tré” Fischer about the multidistrict litigation resulting from the winter storm.
July 21, 2021Mentions
Tenaska Power Services wants a Texas federal court to toss a chemical manufacturing company’s suit challenging $15.8 million in costs from February’s historic winter storm, arguing it rightfully passed along charges imposed by Texas’ grid operator to the company. Olin is represented by Joseph A. Fischer III, Meghan Elaine Griffiths and William J. Stowe of Jackson Walker LLP.
June 22, 2021Mentions
A three-judge panel rejected an appeal of a lower court’s decision not to grant the Williams Cos., Dynegy Marketing & Trade and others summary judgment in the price-fixing suit, but the panel came up with a different reason for its ruling. Dynegy is represented by Edwin M. Buffmire, Adam Aston, Jennifer Caughey, Heather Heartfield, Jay K. Wieser and Joseph A. Fischer III of Jackson Walker LLP.
June 11, 2021Mentions
The Electric Reliability Council of Texas Inc. and other defendants facing lawsuits over loss of power and water services during February’s deadly winter storm can consolidate 157 related cases in a multidistrict litigation pretrial court, a state panel has ruled. The Texas Supreme Court’s Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granted a request on Thursday to address the cases together after the defendants asked that they be grouped given the similar circumstances of the lawsuits that sprung up after Winter Storm Uri caused outages across the state.
June 10, 2021Mentions
Jackson Walker Client Asks Texas Supreme Court to Grant Request for In-Person Jury Trial in Personal Injury Suit
In a petition for writ of mandamus filed on June 8, 2021, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Houston Inc. requested the Texas Supreme Court order an in-person jury trial after Harris County District Judge Dedra Davis set the case for a remote jury trial over Zoom for June 9. The Texas Supreme Court granted Allied Aviation’s motion for stay of the remote trial while the petition for writ of mandamus is under consideration.
June 2, 2021Mentions
ERCOT has tapped Winstead for defense, while power companies that were sued across the Lone Star State have hired Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins, Jackson Walker and other Big Law firms.
May 3, 2021Mentions
Chemical manufacturing company Olin Corp. said in Texas federal court that it wants $15.8 million from Tenaska Power Services, which it says conflated terms of two contracts and wrongly tried to pass on costs it incurred from Texas’ grid operator during February’s historic winter storm.